After receiving an email regarding yesterday's post about FCS stat leaders I thought this was as good a time as any to toss up the full NCAA listing of Dartmouth's statistics from the 2022 season.
Here is a smörgåsbord of stats posted by the NCAA in somewhat random order. OA is Dartmouth's overall ranking in the FCS. The rest should be self-explanatory. Have at it!
|
Dartmouth Statistics |
OA |
Ivy |
|
Ivy Leader |
|
|
3rd Down Conversion Pct (123 ranked) |
39 |
5 |
.423 |
Columbia |
.467 |
|
3rd Down Conversion Pct Defense (123 ranked) |
98 |
8 |
.450 |
Columbia |
.361 |
|
4th Down Conversion Pct (122 ranked) |
61 |
5 |
.462 |
Cornell |
.556 |
|
4th Down Conversion Pct Defense (123 ranked) |
37 |
5 |
.400 |
Columbia |
.200 |
|
Blocked Kicks (75 ranked) |
44 |
6 |
2 |
Harvard |
7 |
|
Blocked Kicks Allowed (122 ranked) |
35 |
2 |
2 |
Yale |
0 |
|
Blocked Punts (30 ranked) |
30 |
4 |
1 |
Harvard Penn |
4 4 |
|
Blocked Punts Allowed (123 ranked) |
1 |
1 |
0 |
5 teams tied |
0 |
|
Completion Percentage (123 ranked) |
58 |
6 |
.592 |
Princeton |
.690 |
|
Defensive TDs (60 ranked) |
|
|
|
Columbia |
3 |
|
Fewest Penalties (122 ranked) |
14 |
1 |
49 |
Columbia Dartmouth |
49 49 |
|
Fewest Penalties Per Game (123 ranked) |
25 |
1 |
4.90 |
Columbia Dartmouth |
4.90 4.90 |
|
Fewest Penalty Yards (123 ranked) |
14 |
2 |
423 |
Columbia |
396 |
|
Fewest Penalty Yards Per Game (123 ranked) |
27 |
2 |
42.30 |
Columbia |
39.60 |
|
First Downs Defense (123 ranked) |
26 |
8 |
204 |
Penn |
176 |
|
First Downs Offense (123 ranked) |
98 |
8 |
183 |
Brown |
215 |
|
Fumbles Lost (121 ranked) |
42 |
6 |
6 |
Penn |
2 |
|
Fumbles Recovered (122 ranked) |
104 |
6 |
4 |
Princeton |
8 |
|
Kickoff Return Defense (123 ranked) |
76 |
6 |
21.12 |
Cornell |
14.44 |
|
Kickoff Returns (123 ranked) |
11 |
2 |
24.33 |
Penn |
26.41 |
|
Net Punting (123 ranked) |
97 |
5 |
33.37 |
Penn |
37.16 |
|
Passes Had Intercepted (122 ranked) |
13 |
2 |
6 |
Princeton |
5 |
|
Passes Intercepted (122 ranked) |
105 |
6 |
6 |
Princeton |
16 |
|
Passing Offense (123 ranked) |
105 |
8 |
163.6 |
Princeton |
274.2 |
|
Passing Yards Allowed (123 ranked) |
16 |
1 |
187.5 |
Dartmouth |
187.5 |
|
Passing Yards per Completion (123 ranked) |
109 |
6 |
1.42 |
Harvard |
12.64 |
|
Punt Return Defense (123 ranked) |
71 |
7 |
8.85 |
Brown |
200 |
|
Punt Returns (123 ranked) |
111 |
8 |
3.12 |
Yale |
9.10 |
|
Red Zone Defense (123 ranked) |
10 |
3 |
.707 |
Princeton |
.696 |
|
Red Zone Offense (123 ranked) |
62 |
5 |
.794 |
Penn |
.895 |
|
Rushing Defense (123 ranked) |
62 |
7 |
159.2 |
Penn |
89.2 |
|
Rushing Offense (123 ranked) |
52 |
2 |
158.8 |
Yale |
232.8 |
|
Sacks Allowed (123 ranked) |
23 |
3 |
1.40 |
Yale |
.70 |
|
Scoring Defense (123 ranked) |
13 |
4 |
2.5 |
Princeton |
13.5 |
|
Scoring Offense (123 ranked) |
96 |
8 |
2.1 |
Yale |
3.5 |
|
Tackles for Loss Allowed (123 ranked) |
30 |
5 |
4.90 |
Harvard Penn |
400 400 |
|
Team Passing Efficiency (123 ranked) |
86 |
7 |
116.54 |
Princeton |
146.63 |
|
Team Passing Efficiency Defense (123 ranked) |
50 |
5 |
128.13 |
Princeton |
115.37 |
|
Team Sacks (123 ranked) |
77 |
5 |
1.80 |
Penn |
3.40 |
|
Team Tackles for Loss (123 ranked) |
86 |
5 |
5.2 |
Penn |
7.5 |
|
Time of Possession (123 ranked) |
105 |
8 |
27:45 |
Cornell |
33:32 |
|
Total Defense (123 ranked) |
34 |
5 |
346.7 |
Princeton |
299.7 |
|
Total Offense (123 ranked) |
92 |
8 |
322.4 |
Yale |
412.8 |
|
Turnover Margin (123 ranked) |
78 |
4 |
-.20 |
Princeton |
1.60 |
|
Turnovers Gained (123 ranked) |
113 |
7 |
10 |
Princeton |
24 |
|
Turnovers Lost (123 ranked) |
14 |
3 |
12 |
Princeton |
8 |
|
Winning Percentage (122 ranked) |
85 |
7 |
.300 |
Penn Princeton Yale |
.800 .800 .800 |
LB Jalen Mackie (6-0 236), UMassPatience and twitch from an off-ball linebacker perspective was impressive. I thought Mackie performed well during the LB/RB 1-on-1 drills, which are heavily tilted toward the offensive side of the ball. After transferring to UMass from Dartmouth, Mackie was ready for the step up in competition at the CGS and proved it out there on the field.
#
EXTRA POINT
My visiting childhood friend never got to ski yesterday with a steady rain and the temperature challenging 40 degrees. Nor has he had a chance to see our wonderful views with the mountains hidden by heavy cloud cover. He's headed back to his Cape Cod home this afternoon but before he does he's bravely strapping on my microspikes and will join me on my daily hike. It's 24 degrees and that has him a little apprehensive, but when I told him I've hiked it in when the temp was well below zero he decided he's going to give it a shot. Hopefully by the time we get to the top the sky will have opened up. Either way, it should be fun.
